Quattr vs Archipel AI: Complete Comparison 2025
Choosing between Quattr and Archipel AI can be challenging. Both are solutions, but they have distinct differences. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll analyze features, pricing, and use cases to help you make the best decision.
An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Google AI Overviews tracking
- AI visibility score/metrics
A France-based GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) / AIO (AI Optimization) agency helping brands improve their visibility and citations in AI assistants and AI search engines (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot) through audits, technical optimizations, and optimized content.
- Website/technical audit
- AI content optimization suggestions
- AI crawler/bot analytics
Key Features Comparison
Here's a detailed breakdown of features offered by each platform:
| Feature | Quattr | Archipel AI |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) | ||
| Google AI Overviews tracking | ||
| AI visibility score/metrics | ||
| Competitive benchmarking / Share of voice | ||
| Actionable recommendations | ||
| AI content optimization suggestions | ||
| Website/technical audit | ||
| Automated reporting | ||
| Free plan available | ||
| GSC/GA4 + first-party data integration | ||
| Internal Linking AI: automated internal linking | ||
| Scaled technical SEO (Core Web Vitals, audits & prioritization) | ||
| AI crawler/bot analytics | ||
| GEO optimization for AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot) and AI search engines | ||
| Advanced GEO strategies (AI optimization methodology) | ||
| Creation/optimization of "GEO-optimized" articles (content designed to be cited in AI answers) | ||
| GEO "boosters" (targeted actions to accelerate outcomes) | ||
| Personalized consulting | ||
| Training + free masterclass (GEO/AIO enablement) | ||
| Experimentation & results-driven positioning |
Pricing Analysis
Archipel AI is more affordable at $0/month, offering a 99.00 dollars savings compared to its competitor.
Pros and Cons
Quattr
- Differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring)
- Connects AI visibility to business metrics via GSC/GA4 and first-party data
- Broad stack: content + internal linking + technical + reporting, useful for tool consolidation
- SMB entry point available while remaining scalable for enterprise needs
- Primarily custom pricing: harder to compare quickly to purely self-serve GEO tools
- Broad suite: may be more than needed if you only want prompt monitoring
- Value depends on execution (deploying changes), not just observation
Archipel AI
- Very GEO/AIO-focused positioning (specialist vs. general-purpose suite)
- End-to-end service approach: audit -> technical optimizations -> content -> "booster" actions
- Training/masterclass helps onboard SEO/content/brand stakeholders
- They emphasize fast outcomes and a test-and-learn mindset
- No clearly public pricing: likely custom quotes (harder to compare directly with SaaS tools)
- Public website is more positioning than operational detail (deliverables, cadence, exact KPIs)
- Execution-heavy (agency model): outcomes depend on scope, content quality, and iteration cycles
- The provided domain (.fr) was not directly accessible during fetch (technical access error)
Best Use Cases
Each platform excels in different scenarios:
QuattrBest for
- 1Enterprise SEO: consolidate analytics + technical + content + AI visibility monitoring
- 2AEO/GEO: increase mentions/citations in AI Overviews and other answer engines
- 3Content teams: prioritize high-impact pages via scoring and guided recommendations
- 4Technical SEO: scale audits (CWV/Lighthouse) and prioritize fixes that unlock growth
- 5Agencies / multi-site teams: governance, reporting, and execution at scale
Archipel AIBest for
- 1B2B/B2C brands aiming to be cited in AI answers for their categories
- 2Website optimization to improve "AI crawlability" and content structure
- 3GEO-driven content strategy: pages/FAQs/articles designed to be used and cited by AI systems
- 4AI competitive visibility audit: compare presence/citations vs competitors on key queries
- 5Enablement: train SEO/marketing teams on GEO/AIO and define an action plan
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Quattr | Archipel AI |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ||
| Starter Price | $99/mo | - |
| Number of Features | 12 | 11 |
Conclusion
Both Quattr and Archipel AI are excellent solutions. Quattr is ideal for enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring, while Archipel AI excels at b2b/b2c brands aiming to be cited in ai answers for their categories. Your choice should depend on your specific needs and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: Quattr or Archipel AI?
It depends on your specific needs. Quattr is better for enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring, while Archipel AI excels at b2b/b2c brands aiming to be cited in ai answers for their categories. Consider your priorities and budget before making a decision.
Is Quattr more expensive than Archipel AI?
Archipel AI is more affordable at $0/month, offering a 99.00 dollars savings.
What is the main difference between Quattr and Archipel AI?
The main difference lies in their focus. Quattr offers Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini), while Archipel AI stands out with AI crawler/bot analytics. Quattr targets enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring, whereas Archipel AI is designed for b2b/b2c brands aiming to be cited in ai answers for their categories.
Which one is easier to use for beginners: Quattr or Archipel AI?
Both platforms are designed to be user-friendly. Quattr differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring), while Archipel AI very geo/aio-focused positioning (specialist vs. general-purpose suite). We recommend trying the free version of each to see which interface suits you better.
Which offers the best value for money: Quattr or Archipel AI?
Archipel AI offers the most competitive pricing at $0/month. However, the best value depends on which features you actually need. If you require multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Quattr might be worth the investment. For website/technical audit, Archipel AI could be the better choice.
Can I switch from Quattr to Archipel AI easily?
Yes, migrating between Quattr and Archipel AI is generally possible. Most platforms offer export features that allow you to transfer your data. We recommend exporting your content before switching and checking the import options available on the new platform.
Which is better for small businesses: Quattr or Archipel AI?
For small businesses, Archipel AI at $0/month is often the most practical choice due to budget constraints. However, Quattr excels at enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring, while Archipel AI is ideal for b2b/b2c brands aiming to be cited in ai answers for their categories. Consider your specific business requirements before deciding.
Are there free alternatives to Quattr and Archipel AI?
Both Quattr and Archipel AI offer free plans with limited features. These free versions are great for testing or light usage. For more advanced needs, the paid plans unlock additional features and higher usage limits.
Can I use both Quattr and Archipel AI together?
Yes, many users combine both tools to leverage their unique strengths. Quattr can handle enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring, while Archipel AI takes care of b2b/b2c brands aiming to be cited in ai answers for their categories. This approach can maximize productivity if budget allows.
What are the pros and cons of Quattr compared to Archipel AI?
Quattr's strengths include differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring), but it has limitations like primarily custom pricing: harder to compare quickly to purely self-serve geo tools. Archipel AI offers very geo/aio-focused positioning (specialist vs. general-purpose suite), though no clearly public pricing: likely custom quotes (harder to compare directly with saas tools). The best choice depends on which trade-offs matter most to you.
Related Articles
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs A France-based GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) / AIO (AI Optimization) agency helping brands improve their visibility and citations in AI assistants and AI search engines (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot) through audits, technical optimizations, and optimized content.
A GEO / AI Search monitoring tool that automatically tracks brand visibility (mentions, link citations, rankings) across multiple AI platforms, with reporting, exports, and a Looker Studio connector. vs An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.