Authoritas vs Quattr: Complete Comparison 2025
Choosing between Authoritas and Quattr can be challenging. Both are solutions, but they have distinct differences. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll analyze features, pricing, and use cases to help you make the best decision.
A full SEO platform (global rank tracking, keyword research, technical audits, competitor benchmarking) plus an 'AI Search' layer to monitor brand visibility in Google AI Overviews and across multiple AI engines/LLMs. Also offers SERP/rank-tracking APIs for programmatic use.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Google AI Overviews tracking
- Brand mention tracking
An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Google AI Overviews tracking
- AI visibility score/metrics
Key Features Comparison
Here's a detailed breakdown of features offered by each platform:
| Feature | Authoritas | Quattr |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) | ||
| Google AI Overviews tracking | ||
| Brand mention tracking | ||
| Competitive benchmarking / Share of voice | ||
| Keyword research | ||
| Website/technical audit | ||
| Multi-country support | ||
| Daily data refresh | ||
| API access | ||
| Free plan available | ||
| SERP features tracking (universal search features) | ||
| AI brand visibility reports with competitive focus | ||
| AI visibility score/metrics | ||
| Actionable recommendations | ||
| AI content optimization suggestions | ||
| Automated reporting | ||
| GSC/GA4 + first-party data integration | ||
| Internal Linking AI: automated internal linking | ||
| Scaled technical SEO (Core Web Vitals, audits & prioritization) |
Pricing Analysis
Quattr is more affordable at $99/month, offering a 280.00 dollars savings compared to its competitor.
Pros and Cons
Authoritas
- Broad coverage: traditional SEO platform + AI Overviews/AI Search tracking in one suite
- Public AI Search pricing (clear credit tiers) and self-serve onboarding
- Enterprise-friendly building blocks via API (useful for internal data/BI pipelines)
- Scale/eCommerce-oriented positioning: competitor insights, SERP analysis, recurring monitoring
- Pricing is in GBP and structured as P1/P2/P3 + Enterprise: your starter/standard/pro model can't represent the full pricing matrix perfectly
- AI Search appears credit-based: real cost clarity depends on how many analyses/reports you run
- It's a broad SEO suite: may feel more 'SEO platform' than a pure GEO/LLM tool (potentially heavier onboarding if you only want GEO)
Quattr
- Differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring)
- Connects AI visibility to business metrics via GSC/GA4 and first-party data
- Broad stack: content + internal linking + technical + reporting, useful for tool consolidation
- SMB entry point available while remaining scalable for enterprise needs
- Primarily custom pricing: harder to compare quickly to purely self-serve GEO tools
- Broad suite: may be more than needed if you only want prompt monitoring
- Value depends on execution (deploying changes), not just observation
Best Use Cases
Each platform excels in different scenarios:
AuthoritasBest for
- 1SEO teams: track rankings and understand how AI Overviews affect organic visibility
- 2eCommerce: benchmark categories/keywords, spot competitive threats, and prioritize SEO work
- 3Brand/Comms: monitor brand presence/reputation in AI surfaces (Overviews/LLMs) and compare vs competitors
- 4Agencies: deliver recurring SEO + AI visibility reporting as standardized deliverables
- 5Data/RevOps: feed internal dashboards via API (SERP/rank tracking) to automate reporting & alerting
QuattrBest for
- 1Enterprise SEO: consolidate analytics + technical + content + AI visibility monitoring
- 2AEO/GEO: increase mentions/citations in AI Overviews and other answer engines
- 3Content teams: prioritize high-impact pages via scoring and guided recommendations
- 4Technical SEO: scale audits (CWV/Lighthouse) and prioritize fixes that unlock growth
- 5Agencies / multi-site teams: governance, reporting, and execution at scale
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Authoritas | Quattr |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ||
| Starter Price | $89/mo | $99/mo |
| Standard Price | $229/mo | - |
| Pro Price | $379/mo | - |
| Number of Features | 12 | 12 |
Conclusion
Both Authoritas and Quattr are excellent solutions. Authoritas is ideal for seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Quattr excels at enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. Your choice should depend on your specific needs and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: Authoritas or Quattr?
It depends on your specific needs. Authoritas is better for seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Quattr excels at enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. Consider your priorities and budget before making a decision.
Is Authoritas more expensive than Quattr?
Quattr is more affordable at $99/month, offering a 280.00 dollars savings.
What is the main difference between Authoritas and Quattr?
The main difference lies in their focus. Authoritas offers Brand mention tracking, while Quattr stands out with AI visibility score/metrics. Authoritas targets seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, whereas Quattr is designed for enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring.
Which one is easier to use for beginners: Authoritas or Quattr?
Both platforms are designed to be user-friendly. Authoritas broad coverage: traditional seo platform + ai overviews/ai search tracking in one suite, while Quattr differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring). We recommend trying the free version of each to see which interface suits you better.
Which offers the best value for money: Authoritas or Quattr?
Quattr offers the most competitive pricing at $99/month. However, the best value depends on which features you actually need. If you require multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Authoritas might be worth the investment. For multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Quattr could be the better choice.
Can I switch from Authoritas to Quattr easily?
Yes, migrating between Authoritas and Quattr is generally possible. Most platforms offer export features that allow you to transfer your data. We recommend exporting your content before switching and checking the import options available on the new platform.
Which is better for small businesses: Authoritas or Quattr?
For small businesses, Quattr at $99/month is often the most practical choice due to budget constraints. However, Authoritas excels at seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Quattr is ideal for enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. Consider your specific business requirements before deciding.
Are there free alternatives to Authoritas and Quattr?
Both Authoritas and Quattr offer free plans with limited features. These free versions are great for testing or light usage. For more advanced needs, the paid plans unlock additional features and higher usage limits.
Can I use both Authoritas and Quattr together?
Yes, many users combine both tools to leverage their unique strengths. Authoritas can handle seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Quattr takes care of enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. This approach can maximize productivity if budget allows.
What are the pros and cons of Authoritas compared to Quattr?
Authoritas's strengths include broad coverage: traditional seo platform + ai overviews/ai search tracking in one suite, but it has limitations like pricing is in gbp and structured as p1/p2/p3 + enterprise: your starter/standard/pro model can't represent the full pricing matrix perfectly. Quattr offers differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring), though primarily custom pricing: harder to compare quickly to purely self-serve geo tools. The best choice depends on which trade-offs matter most to you.
Related Articles
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs A full SEO platform (global rank tracking, keyword research, technical audits, competitor benchmarking) plus an 'AI Search' layer to monitor brand visibility in Google AI Overviews and across multiple AI engines/LLMs. Also offers SERP/rank-tracking APIs for programmatic use.
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.
A GEO / AI Search monitoring tool that automatically tracks brand visibility (mentions, link citations, rankings) across multiple AI platforms, with reporting, exports, and a Looker Studio connector. vs A full SEO platform (global rank tracking, keyword research, technical audits, competitor benchmarking) plus an 'AI Search' layer to monitor brand visibility in Google AI Overviews and across multiple AI engines/LLMs. Also offers SERP/rank-tracking APIs for programmatic use.