Authoritas vs Writesonic: Complete Comparison 2025
Choosing between Authoritas and Writesonic can be challenging. Both are solutions, but they have distinct differences. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll analyze features, pricing, and use cases to help you make the best decision.
A full SEO platform (global rank tracking, keyword research, technical audits, competitor benchmarking) plus an 'AI Search' layer to monitor brand visibility in Google AI Overviews and across multiple AI engines/LLMs. Also offers SERP/rank-tracking APIs for programmatic use.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Google AI Overviews tracking
- Brand mention tracking
An SEO + content + GEO (AI search visibility) suite combining content creation/refresh, SEO tooling (keyword research, clustering, audits/optimizer), and AI visibility tracking across AI platforms (mentions, citations, sentiment, share of voice) with an "Action Center" to turn gaps into concrete tasks.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Brand mention tracking
- Citation and source tracking
Key Features Comparison
Here's a detailed breakdown of features offered by each platform:
| Feature | Authoritas | Writesonic |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) | ||
| Google AI Overviews tracking | ||
| Brand mention tracking | ||
| Competitive benchmarking / Share of voice | ||
| Keyword research | ||
| Website/technical audit | ||
| Multi-country support | ||
| Daily data refresh | ||
| API access | ||
| Free plan available | ||
| SERP features tracking (universal search features) | ||
| AI brand visibility reports with competitive focus | ||
| Citation and source tracking | ||
| AI visibility score/metrics | ||
| Sentiment analysis | ||
| Actionable recommendations | ||
| AI crawler/bot analytics | ||
| AI content optimization suggestions | ||
| AI content writer/generator | ||
| Free trial available | ||
| Citation Gap Analysis: find where competitors get cited | ||
| Page-level citation tracing: tie citations to specific pages |
Pricing Analysis
Writesonic is more affordable at $249/month, offering a 130.00 dollars savings compared to its competitor.
Pros and Cons
Authoritas
- Broad coverage: traditional SEO platform + AI Overviews/AI Search tracking in one suite
- Public AI Search pricing (clear credit tiers) and self-serve onboarding
- Enterprise-friendly building blocks via API (useful for internal data/BI pipelines)
- Scale/eCommerce-oriented positioning: competitor insights, SERP analysis, recurring monitoring
- Pricing is in GBP and structured as P1/P2/P3 + Enterprise: your starter/standard/pro model can't represent the full pricing matrix perfectly
- AI Search appears credit-based: real cost clarity depends on how many analyses/reports you run
- It's a broad SEO suite: may feel more 'SEO platform' than a pure GEO/LLM tool (potentially heavier onboarding if you only want GEO)
Writesonic
- Combines content + SEO + GEO: good if you want execution (produce content) and measurement (AI visibility) in one place
- More action-oriented GEO (citation gaps -> tasks) vs. a pure mentions dashboard
- AI Traffic Analytics adds a complementary signal (AI crawler activity) that GA often misses
- Public, readable pricing (Lite/Standard/Professional/Advanced + Enterprise)
- GEO/AI Search Visibility is positioned as available from the Professional tier, which raises the entry cost if you mainly want AI tracking
- Broad suite: may be more than needed if you only want lightweight GEO monitoring
- Higher tiers (Advanced/Enterprise) and needs (scale, integrations, support) can quickly move into sales-led territory
Best Use Cases
Each platform excels in different scenarios:
AuthoritasBest for
- 1SEO teams: track rankings and understand how AI Overviews affect organic visibility
- 2eCommerce: benchmark categories/keywords, spot competitive threats, and prioritize SEO work
- 3Brand/Comms: monitor brand presence/reputation in AI surfaces (Overviews/LLMs) and compare vs competitors
- 4Agencies: deliver recurring SEO + AI visibility reporting as standardized deliverables
- 5Data/RevOps: feed internal dashboards via API (SERP/rank tracking) to automate reporting & alerting
WritesonicBest for
- 1SEO/GEO: track visibility, citations, sentiment, and SOV across multiple AI platforms
- 2Content marketing: prioritize content creation/refresh using citation gaps and AI opportunities
- 3Brand/Comms: monitor perception (sentiment) and narratives in AI answers
- 4Growth teams: combine AI crawler activity + content performance signals to iterate faster
- 5Support/Product: deploy an AI chatbot via Botsonic (CX use case), separately from the GEO module
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Authoritas | Writesonic |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ||
| Starter Price | $89/mo | $49/mo |
| Standard Price | $229/mo | $99/mo |
| Pro Price | $379/mo | $249/mo |
| Number of Features | 12 | 14 |
Conclusion
Both Authoritas and Writesonic are excellent solutions. Authoritas is ideal for seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Writesonic excels at seo/geo: track visibility, citations, sentiment, and sov across multiple ai platforms. Your choice should depend on your specific needs and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: Authoritas or Writesonic?
It depends on your specific needs. Authoritas is better for seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Writesonic excels at seo/geo: track visibility, citations, sentiment, and sov across multiple ai platforms. Consider your priorities and budget before making a decision.
Is Authoritas more expensive than Writesonic?
Writesonic is more affordable at $249/month, offering a 130.00 dollars savings.
What is the main difference between Authoritas and Writesonic?
The main difference lies in their focus. Authoritas offers Google AI Overviews tracking, while Writesonic stands out with Citation and source tracking. Authoritas targets seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, whereas Writesonic is designed for seo/geo: track visibility, citations, sentiment, and sov across multiple ai platforms.
Which one is easier to use for beginners: Authoritas or Writesonic?
Both platforms are designed to be user-friendly. Authoritas broad coverage: traditional seo platform + ai overviews/ai search tracking in one suite, while Writesonic combines content + seo + geo: good if you want execution (produce content) and measurement (ai visibility) in one place. We recommend trying the free version of each to see which interface suits you better.
Which offers the best value for money: Authoritas or Writesonic?
Writesonic offers the most competitive pricing at $249/month. However, the best value depends on which features you actually need. If you require multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Authoritas might be worth the investment. For multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Writesonic could be the better choice.
Can I switch from Authoritas to Writesonic easily?
Yes, migrating between Authoritas and Writesonic is generally possible. Most platforms offer export features that allow you to transfer your data. We recommend exporting your content before switching and checking the import options available on the new platform.
Which is better for small businesses: Authoritas or Writesonic?
For small businesses, Writesonic at $249/month is often the most practical choice due to budget constraints. However, Authoritas excels at seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Writesonic is ideal for seo/geo: track visibility, citations, sentiment, and sov across multiple ai platforms. Consider your specific business requirements before deciding.
Are there free alternatives to Authoritas and Writesonic?
Both Authoritas and Writesonic offer free plans with limited features. These free versions are great for testing or light usage. For more advanced needs, the paid plans unlock additional features and higher usage limits.
Can I use both Authoritas and Writesonic together?
Yes, many users combine both tools to leverage their unique strengths. Authoritas can handle seo teams: track rankings and understand how ai overviews affect organic visibility, while Writesonic takes care of seo/geo: track visibility, citations, sentiment, and sov across multiple ai platforms. This approach can maximize productivity if budget allows.
What are the pros and cons of Authoritas compared to Writesonic?
Authoritas's strengths include broad coverage: traditional seo platform + ai overviews/ai search tracking in one suite, but it has limitations like pricing is in gbp and structured as p1/p2/p3 + enterprise: your starter/standard/pro model can't represent the full pricing matrix perfectly. Writesonic offers combines content + seo + geo: good if you want execution (produce content) and measurement (ai visibility) in one place, though geo/ai search visibility is positioned as available from the professional tier, which raises the entry cost if you mainly want ai tracking. The best choice depends on which trade-offs matter most to you.
Related Articles
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs A full SEO platform (global rank tracking, keyword research, technical audits, competitor benchmarking) plus an 'AI Search' layer to monitor brand visibility in Google AI Overviews and across multiple AI engines/LLMs. Also offers SERP/rank-tracking APIs for programmatic use.
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs An SEO + content + GEO (AI search visibility) suite combining content creation/refresh, SEO tooling (keyword research, clustering, audits/optimizer), and AI visibility tracking across AI platforms (mentions, citations, sentiment, share of voice) with an "Action Center" to turn gaps into concrete tasks.
A GEO / AI Search monitoring tool that automatically tracks brand visibility (mentions, link citations, rankings) across multiple AI platforms, with reporting, exports, and a Looker Studio connector. vs A full SEO platform (global rank tracking, keyword research, technical audits, competitor benchmarking) plus an 'AI Search' layer to monitor brand visibility in Google AI Overviews and across multiple AI engines/LLMs. Also offers SERP/rank-tracking APIs for programmatic use.