Profound vs Quattr: Complete Comparison 2025
Choosing between Profound and Quattr can be challenging. Both are solutions, but they have distinct differences. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll analyze features, pricing, and use cases to help you make the best decision.
An enterprise-focused GEO / Answer Engine Optimization platform that measures how a brand shows up in AI answers (visibility, share of voice, sentiment, citations), surfaces opportunities (high-volume prompts, influential sources), and helps create/optimize AI-ready content through workflows and automation.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Google AI Overviews tracking
- Brand mention tracking
An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.
- Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini)
- Google AI Overviews tracking
- AI visibility score/metrics
Key Features Comparison
Here's a detailed breakdown of features offered by each platform:
| Feature | Profound | Quattr |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-platform AI tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) | ||
| Google AI Overviews tracking | ||
| Brand mention tracking | ||
| Citation and source tracking | ||
| AI visibility score/metrics | ||
| Sentiment analysis | ||
| Competitive benchmarking / Share of voice | ||
| Actionable recommendations | ||
| AI content optimization suggestions | ||
| Historical tracking and trends | ||
| CSV exports | ||
| AI crawler/bot analytics | ||
| Team collaboration / Workspaces | ||
| SSO / Enterprise security | ||
| Free plan available | ||
| Website/technical audit | ||
| Automated reporting | ||
| GSC/GA4 + first-party data integration | ||
| Internal Linking AI: automated internal linking | ||
| Scaled technical SEO (Core Web Vitals, audits & prioritization) |
Pricing Analysis
Both Profound and Quattr are priced at $99/month for their premium plans, making pricing not a differentiating factor.
Pros and Cons
Profound
- Very complete stack: analytics (visibility/citations/sentiment) + demand (Prompt Volumes) + crawl/attribution (Agent Analytics) + content ops (Workflows)
- Broad multi-engine coverage with data captured from real front-end experiences
- Strong enterprise posture (SOC2, SSO, support) and ability to track many engines / multiple entities on Enterprise
- Action-oriented: insights plus integrated content creation/optimization tooling
- Historically enterprise-leaning positioning: access can be more sales-led depending on context
- Starter/Growth are tightly scoped around prompt counts and platform coverage
- If you only need basic prompt tracking, the platform may be broader than necessary
Quattr
- Differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring)
- Connects AI visibility to business metrics via GSC/GA4 and first-party data
- Broad stack: content + internal linking + technical + reporting, useful for tool consolidation
- SMB entry point available while remaining scalable for enterprise needs
- Primarily custom pricing: harder to compare quickly to purely self-serve GEO tools
- Broad suite: may be more than needed if you only want prompt monitoring
- Value depends on execution (deploying changes), not just observation
Best Use Cases
Each platform excels in different scenarios:
ProfoundBest for
- 1GEO / LLMO: track visibility, SOV, sentiment, and citations across multiple answer engines
- 2Content teams: create and optimize citation-winning content via templates + workflows
- 3PR & Brand: monitor perception/accuracy and narratives associated with the brand
- 4Tech/SEO: diagnose AI crawlability, understand AI-driven traffic impact, and prioritize fixes
- 5E-commerce: improve product presence in ChatGPT Shopping (placement, attributes, sentiment)
- 6Enterprise: governance, security (SSO/SOC2), dedicated support, and expanded coverage (10 platforms)
QuattrBest for
- 1Enterprise SEO: consolidate analytics + technical + content + AI visibility monitoring
- 2AEO/GEO: increase mentions/citations in AI Overviews and other answer engines
- 3Content teams: prioritize high-impact pages via scoring and guided recommendations
- 4Technical SEO: scale audits (CWV/Lighthouse) and prioritize fixes that unlock growth
- 5Agencies / multi-site teams: governance, reporting, and execution at scale
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Profound | Quattr |
|---|---|---|
| Free Plan | ||
| Starter Price | $99/mo | $99/mo |
| Standard Price | $399/mo | - |
| Number of Features | 15 | 12 |
Conclusion
Both Profound and Quattr are excellent solutions. Profound is ideal for geo / llmo: track visibility, sov, sentiment, and citations across multiple answer engines, while Quattr excels at enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. Your choice should depend on your specific needs and budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: Profound or Quattr?
It depends on your specific needs. Profound is better for geo / llmo: track visibility, sov, sentiment, and citations across multiple answer engines, while Quattr excels at enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. Consider your priorities and budget before making a decision.
Is Profound more expensive than Quattr?
Both Profound and Quattr are priced at $99/month for their premium plans.
What is the main difference between Profound and Quattr?
The main difference lies in their focus. Profound offers Brand mention tracking, while Quattr stands out with Website/technical audit. Profound targets geo / llmo: track visibility, sov, sentiment, and citations across multiple answer engines, whereas Quattr is designed for enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring.
Which one is easier to use for beginners: Profound or Quattr?
Both platforms are designed to be user-friendly. Profound very complete stack: analytics (visibility/citations/sentiment) + demand (prompt volumes) + crawl/attribution (agent analytics) + content ops (workflows), while Quattr differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring). We recommend trying the free version of each to see which interface suits you better.
Which offers the best value for money: Profound or Quattr?
Profound offers the most competitive pricing at $99/month. However, the best value depends on which features you actually need. If you require multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Profound might be worth the investment. For multi-platform ai tracking (chatgpt, perplexity, claude, gemini), Quattr could be the better choice.
Can I switch from Profound to Quattr easily?
Yes, migrating between Profound and Quattr is generally possible. Most platforms offer export features that allow you to transfer your data. We recommend exporting your content before switching and checking the import options available on the new platform.
Which is better for small businesses: Profound or Quattr?
For small businesses, Profound at $99/month is often the most practical choice due to budget constraints. However, Profound excels at geo / llmo: track visibility, sov, sentiment, and citations across multiple answer engines, while Quattr is ideal for enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. Consider your specific business requirements before deciding.
Are there free alternatives to Profound and Quattr?
Both Profound and Quattr offer free plans with limited features. These free versions are great for testing or light usage. For more advanced needs, the paid plans unlock additional features and higher usage limits.
Can I use both Profound and Quattr together?
Yes, many users combine both tools to leverage their unique strengths. Profound can handle geo / llmo: track visibility, sov, sentiment, and citations across multiple answer engines, while Quattr takes care of enterprise seo: consolidate analytics + technical + content + ai visibility monitoring. This approach can maximize productivity if budget allows.
What are the pros and cons of Profound compared to Quattr?
Profound's strengths include very complete stack: analytics (visibility/citations/sentiment) + demand (prompt volumes) + crawl/attribution (agent analytics) + content ops (workflows), but it has limitations like historically enterprise-leaning positioning: access can be more sales-led depending on context. Quattr offers differentiated execution-led positioning (not just mention/citation monitoring), though primarily custom pricing: harder to compare quickly to purely self-serve geo tools. The best choice depends on which trade-offs matter most to you.
Related Articles
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs An enterprise-focused GEO / Answer Engine Optimization platform that measures how a brand shows up in AI answers (visibility, share of voice, sentiment, citations), surfaces opportunities (high-volume prompts, influential sources), and helps create/optimize AI-ready content through workflows and automation.
A GEO (AI visibility) platform to analyze how AI models understand your website, get actionable optimization recommendations, track mentions across AI platforms, and benchmark visibility against competitors. vs An execution-led SEO + AEO/GEO platform that connects AI answer visibility with first-party data (Search Console/GA4) and turns insights into deployable actions (content, internal linking, technical fixes) to improve citations/mentions and business impact.
A GEO / AI Search monitoring tool that automatically tracks brand visibility (mentions, link citations, rankings) across multiple AI platforms, with reporting, exports, and a Looker Studio connector. vs An enterprise-focused GEO / Answer Engine Optimization platform that measures how a brand shows up in AI answers (visibility, share of voice, sentiment, citations), surfaces opportunities (high-volume prompts, influential sources), and helps create/optimize AI-ready content through workflows and automation.